New Jersey Transit recently opened its committee meetings to the public, allowing riders greater insight into the agency’s operations and performance stats. Ridership data made available at the August Customer Service Committee meeting has revealed some interesting usage trends across NJ Transit’s operations, highlighting customer needs in several areas.
The most encouraging insight gained from the committee’s report is that total June 2014 ridership across all three modes increased by 4.8 percent compared to June 2013, while statewide vehicle miles traveled (VMT) decreased and gas prices continued to soar. Rail ridership was up 7.3 percent, and the HBLR showed tremendous gains with a 6.9 percent increase in May and 7.4 percent in June, compared to 2013.
With statewide transit ridership increasing at such an encouraging rate, the state would be wise to prioritize a sustainable funding source for transportation projects. Thankfully it seems there is growing momentum to help push this issue in the right direction, though with NJ Transit already dependent on borrowing against its own capital funds to cover growing operating costs, a solution to the state’s transportation funding crisis can’t come soon enough.
Ridership stats across NJ Transit’s three transit modes allowed us to identify three specific transportation infrastructure projects that, if prioritized, could significantly improve and expand existing service for NJ Transit customers.
Rail
The Northeast Corridor ridership takes four spots out of the top five, with Midtown Direct service on the Morris & Essex Line in the top spot.
Line | Train | July 2014 Ridership |
Midtown Direct M&E | 6620 7:33am from Dover | 27,918 |
Northeast Corridor | 3712 8:39am from Jersey Ave | 27,632 |
Northeast Corridor | 3957 6:01pm from NY Penn | 26,950 |
Northeast Corridor | 3502 8:08am from Rahway | 20,042 |
Northeast Corridor | 3515 6:16pm from NY Penn | 19,668 |
Midtown Direct service, which offers a one-seat ride to New York’s Penn Station, was added in 1996. Since the addition of the service, homes near train stations served by Midtown Direct increased in value by an average of $23,000 per home.
The now defunct Access to the Region’s Core (ARC) project would have provided not only fast and more frequent service between New York and New Jersey as well as similar financial property value gains, but it would have ensured sustainable cross-Hudson transit infrastructure. Amtrak’s proposed Gateway project would significantly expand and improve NJ Transit service as well as provide additional one-seat rides to Penn Station. So far, the right-of-way has been preserved, but funding for the project has yet to be identified.
Light Rail
Hudson-Bergen Light Rail (HBLR) was hands down the winner in this category with 475,541 riders in July. This is more than double the ridership of Newark Light Rail and over four times that of the RiverLine.
Line | July 2014 Ridership |
Hudson Bergen Light Rail | 475,541 |
Newark Light Rail | 207,163 |
RiverLine Light Rail | 99,429 |
HBLR only serves Hudson County at this point, as plans to extend the line to Tenafly were quashed. This spring, 12 municipalities along the line lobbied for expanded service to Bergen County’s Englewood Hospital, the largest employer in Bergen County, asserting that the plan would “create more jobs, decrease traffic congestion and enhance economic development throughout the region.” Public hearings on the proposal will continue through the fall, with a final impact study planned for the spring of 2015.
Bus
Unsurprisingly, all of the top five bus lines all terminated in New York. Four of the five lines originate in Bergen County, which has the second highest number of New York-bound commuters in the Garden State.
Line | Route | July 2014 Ridership |
166 | Dumont-Tenafly-NY | 379,158 |
165 | Westwood-NY | 316,564 |
139 | Lakewood-Old Bridge-NY | 278,871 |
163 | Ridgewood-NY | 200,537 |
167 | Harrington Pk-NY | 176,366 |
Unfortunately for these New York-bound commuters, the last stop on their commute is a failing bus terminal. It likely comes as no surprise that the Port Authority Bus Terminal,which Port Authority Board of Commissioners Vice Chair Scott Rechler called “obsolete in every way you can imagine,” underperformed all other major regional bus terminals by more than 10 percent with an on-time departure rate of 84.9 percent for the month of July. NJ Transit’s bus service had 10 percent lower average on-time performance than NJ Transit’s light rail service between August 2012 and July 2014, with congestion cited as one of the contributing factors for lagging bus service.
However, there is some good news on the horizon: the PABT is expected to undergo improvements. In July, the PANYNJ Board of Commissioners unanimously approved a resolution reallocating $90 million from its current 10-year Capital Program to a plan for improvements under the working title “Quality of Commute.” A detailed plan on how the Port Authority will spend that money is expected to be presented at this Wednesday’s Board meeting in Jersey City.
ICYMI: What 4 issues could derail @NJTRANSIT plans to move more rider to NYC? http://tinyurl.com/ocltctr #NJTFF #infrastructure #Transportation
Re: Light Rail ridership
What the numbers really show is the poor performance of the River Line.
HBLR has 34.1 directional route miles (from NJ Transit Facts at a Glance
http://www.njtransit.com/pdf/FactsAtaGlance.pdf)
That puts HBLR boardings at about 14,000 per directional route mile for the month of July.
Newark Light Rail is much shorter – 6.2 directional route miles. That puts July boardings at 16,700 per directional route mile, actually higher than HBLR.
On the other hand, the River Line is over twice as long as HBLR, at 69.7 directional route miles. Its July boardings work out to only 1,400 per directional route mile. Thus, River Line is a very poor performer, thwice the mileage of HBLR; but only 10% of the boardings.
Note: River Line has longer passenger trip lengths, in part because a passenger can go much further. But it is a real outlier in ridership and, in my opinion, a very poor investment of NJ taxpayer dollars.
[…] Jersey Transit –While only a partial solution to addressing capacity concerns, the agency will be replacing all current train cars with double decker designs and all buses […]
It might be interesting to note that the busiest bus route on Long Island, the n6 Jamaica-Hempstead, carried 397,666 in July 2014. This is slightly more than NJT’s Rte 166.
Very cool analysis Rob! While almost perfectly executed and lovely to ride, the RiverLINE would seem to have been a not so wise investment. I wonder what Middlesex County would have looked like if they spent that money on a Middlesex County Lightrail (focused around New Brunswick) which was projected to have much higher ridership numbers. We can only wonder.
[…] Transit ridership continues to grow, with an increase in total ridership between 2013 and 2014 of more than 950,000 […]
[…] the Transportation Trust Fund crisis, progress on the Camden-Glassboro light rail project and the Hudson-Bergen light rail expansion is at a […]
[…] has had no real ridership growth since 2012, ridership on other systems has been only going up. NJ Transit posted systemwide ridership growth of 4.8% between June 2014 and June 2013. In New York, the MTA reported subway ridership increased 2.6% in […]
[…] for at least a year—which could happen as early as this year. Given that NJ Transit ridership is steadily increasing, the work would cause major disruption to service. Last week, Senate President […]
[…] City region already has the highest transit ridership of any region in the country, and somehow, ridership continues to grow. But it’s not exactly clear where in the region this ridership growth is […]
Regarding the RiverLine – by my latest calculation, costs $ 8.50 subsidy for each rider.
How is that called an “investment” ?