Archives
Categories

What Is the Benefit of an MTA Lockbox That Is Not Secure?

Call it a sweep, a transfer, a diversion, theft.  Regardless of the semantics war surrounding the use of $20 million in dedicated MTA funds to bolster New York State’s General Fund, the substance of the matter is this: the lockbox law brokered by Governor Cuomo in 2011 is meaningless.  With one key clause — “notwithstanding any law to the contrary” — the Governor’s 2013-2014 Executive Budget unlocked the security box holding MTA funds.  Advocates feared that this would be the case when lockbox legislation was significantly altered in 2011.

Some Albany insiders rationalize that because this money will be used to pay off State bonds that benefit the MTA, they are not diverting the money. However, as NYS Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli points out in his February 13 review of the Executive Budget, this $20 million transfer is going to General Fund relief. These are State obligations, and should be paid for with State funds.  A very precarious future for transit would be set if funds restricted for capital and operating expenses at the MTA are instead used to relieve pressure on the General Fund.

The core of the issue is about precedent and less about dollar amount.  In fact, the Executive Budget provides a significant increase in aid to the MTA in 2013 and 2014 while continuing to fill the hole of $307 million created by the 2012 restructuring of the payroll mobility tax.  The concern is the precedent being set by this sweep.  In addition to the myriad financial pressures perpetually facing the MTA, the outlook becomes even more bleak if dedicated funds on which day-to-day service depends are siphoned off for other State needs.

Amidst the fury of budget negotiations happening this week in Albany, legislators will have to ensure that this $20 million indeed goes towards what it was intended: ensuring that the system adequately serves 8 million users a day.

Share This Post on Social
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

10 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
trackback

[…] of a toothless transit “lockbox” bill, that was effectively sidestepped with six words. This precedent could lead to larger sweeps in the future that could do more damage to the […]

trackback

[…] this case, the problems are manifold. The MTA is consistently underfunded because the Legislature robs dedicated funds to fill other holes in the budget. Political pandering to Staten Island residents in the 1980s […]

trackback

[…] of the New York State Legislature without any dissent. As seen during the 2013 budget season when $20M was diverted from the MTA, the 2011 version eliminated the impact statement requirements, making the […]

trackback

[…] decisions about funds dedicated to transit. This spring, the Governor made a move that proved what advocates had long feared. The 2011 amended law was nothing but a piece of paper, easily nullified with six words: […]

trackback

[…] 2013 executive budget included a $20 million diversion of MTA operating funds. In his budget analysis [PDF], state comptroller Thomas DiNapoli said these funds were being transferred “to pay debt […]

trackback

[…] Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli — Just like what’s happened to MTA funding in recent years, a new report from DiNapoli’s office, says that 78 percent of New York’s dedicated road […]

trackback

[…] the second year in a row, New York State Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli weighed in on a 2014-2015 state budget maneuver […]

trackback

[…] to divert any funds from the MTA’s 2015-2019 capital program, but left the door open for raiding funds that pay for previous capital […]

trackback

[…] early next week. This bill is particularly timely given that in this year’s budget, New York stole yet again from transit […]

trackback

[…] as suspected, New York State will sweep $20 million in dedicated MTA funds to bolster the General Fund. This sets a dangerous precedent for taking “restricted” MTA capital and operating […]

10
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x