An article in last week’s Wall Street Journal indicated a dire need to do something about the Port Authority Bus Terminal, which has reached its capacity, as TSTC has pointed out in reports and videos. But New Jersey’s plan to divert over $1.5 billion in Port Authority money would make it much harder to fund projects to relieve the crowded terminal and reduce congestion on NJ highways and NYC streets.
The Port Authority Bus Terminal accomodates about 6,000 buses that travel underneath the Hudson River every day. Those buses account for 225,000 passenger trips each day — mostly New Jersey residents commuting to and from Manhattan. In the mornings, NY-bound buses wait in the Lincoln Tunnel, on its approaches, and on ramps leading into the terminal until gates open up. During the day, the buses go back to New Jersey (empty) because there are no available gates to park. These same buses then return to Manhattan (empty) to pick up commuters and go back to New Jersey. The terminal is so busy that in the evenings, buses are diverted to Manhattan streets — like planes circling the runway — to make way for other buses . About one in 10 NJ Transit buses leave the terminal at least six minutes late between 3:30 p.m. and 7 p.m.
Money that had been dedicated to the cancelled ARC rail tunnel could go to improvements like a second Manhattan-bound bus lane through the Lincoln Tunnel in the morning, a westbound bus lane during evening rush hours, additional NJ Transit buses, a bus garage on the West Side of Manhattan where buses could park, and a reconstructed Lincoln Tunnel helix. In fact, Port Authority executive director Chris Ward put improvements to the bus terminal “at the top of his list,” according to the Journal.
Not so fast, Port Authority. Enter Governor Christie, who has used the cancellation as an opportunity to get NJ’s hands on this pot of money and bail out the state’s soon-to-be-bankrupt Transportation Trust Fund. Christie’s 5-year transportation funding plan would divert more than $343 million a year of Port Authority money for NJDOT projects. Principal projects to be funded with Port Authority money originally earmarked for ARC include the repairs to the Pulaski Skyway; the Route 7 Wittpenn Bridge in Kearny; Route 139 Viaduct; and the Route 1 & 9 Truck Extension known as Portway New Road in Jersey City.
As previously reported in MTR, NJDOT Commissioner Jim Simpson has described PANYNJ’s contributions to the NJ projects as pretty much a done deal. But the resolution passed during the Authority’s March meeting merely “authorizes” its executive director to “effectuate the Port Authority’s participation” in these projects — or in “suitable replacement projects mutually agreed upon with NJDOT.” That doesn’t indicate a done deal.
To its credit, the Christie administration has committed to increasing bus service in northern New Jersey cities. But it’s missing an opportunity to reduce congestion and improve bus speeds for hundreds of thousands of cross-Hudson commuters.
[…] Christie’s Port Authority Bailout Could Stiff PABT Bus Riders (MTR) […]
If Christie doesn’t value those commuting to Manhattan from New Jersey, why should New York?
Long Island has suffered a severe decline in competitiveness in attracting better off people who commute to Manhattan, compared with the northern suburbs and New Jersey, in recent decades. It’s own pols haven’t helped matters. But perhaps that could be reversed.
New York State gets the income tax revenue from the New Jersey and Connecticut so in my opinion since New York State gets the revenue, New York State has the responsibility for the commutation facilities. When I was a New Jersey resident my belief was that the state insect for New York should be a leech and the bird a cuckoo becauseat the time they were sending welfare recipients to Newark.
While 1 in 10 buses may be delay leaving the Port Authority during rush hour, a higher percentage with passengers are delay arriving because of the circling you mention.
[…] planning and long-term investment into a piggybank for the two states. Bus riders would be hit especially hard as potential investments in projects like a larger Port Authority Bus Terminal get postponed and […]
[…] express service to the Meadowlands from that location. Whether or not the PABT is prepared for more buses is another […]
[…] For years, Tri-State and other advocates have been calling for a westbound XBL to address the capacity limitation of the PABT. Perhaps the Super Bowl is a window of opportunity to get that much need dedicated […]
[…] performance has been a problem for buses using the PABT, and it has become increasingly clear that reliability is crucial to […]
[…] XBL lane would provide tremendous time, environmental and economic benefits to the 225,000 bus commuters that use the tunnel every […]
[…] a bus every weekday (315,000) than on NJ Transit trains (165,000). However, the tight economy and poor transportation decisions have led to the postponement of many key bus service improvements such as a long-discussed new bus […]