Archives
Categories

To a Governor: The Best Laid Transportation Funding Schemes Often Go Awry

The best laid schemes o’ mice an’ men / often go awry
— To a Mouse, by Robert Burns

Governor Christie’s five–year Transportation Capital Program might have looked like his “best laid scheme” when it was announced in 2011, but something has clearly gone awry since then. Tri-State had little confidence that Christie could live up to his promise to pay for transportation with more cash and less debt without identifying new and sustainable revenue sources. And with each year that passed, that little confidence has disintegrated into a complete lack of faith.

Here’s a quick look back at his plan, contrasted with how it’s actually panned out:

TFF_FY2012
Source: TTFA Audited Financial Statement FY2012 and OLS Analysis
TFF_FY2013
Source: TTFA Audited Financial Statement FY2013 and OLS Analysis
TFF_FY2014
Source: TTFA Audited Financial Statement FY2014 and OLS Analysis
TFF_FY2015
Source: TTFA FY2015 Financial Plan and OLS Analysis
TFF_FY2016
Source: OLS Analysis

Governor Christie failed to deliver year after year on his plan “to use more “pay-as-you-go” funding out of the annual state budget to ease a reliance on new borrowing,” and instead used transportation revenues to plug General Fund holes and provide one-shot gimmicks to replenish the Transportation Trust Fund (TTF).

Flipping couch cushions in the Treasurer’s office each year to keep the TTF afloat has resulted in:

  • Over $5.2 billion in new debt (versus the $4.3 billion under Christie’s original plan)
  • No cash balance (needed to pay bills as they come due)
  • No bonding authority for new projects beyond Fiscal Year 2016
  • No revenue to pay debt service on the additional bonding from FY2012-FY2016
  • No identified funding stream to replace Port Authority and Turnpike Authority funding

This means:

  • The TTF will require at least $70 million in new revenues in FY2017 to meet debt service on already issued debt ($1.27 billion annually through FY2024)
  • Spending levels from the TTF will have to increase by approximately $350 million to maintain current funding levels and replace Port Authority funding
  • Spending levels from the TTF will have to increase by $295 million to replace the money from the Turnpike Authority, which will also expire after FY2016
  • Funding levels in FY2017 and beyond will have to exceed the $1.6 billion (historically stagnant) level in order to pay debt and pay for much needed infrastructure projects

But wait, there’s more. That $1.6 billion is simply the New Jersey Department of Transportation’s annual appropriation level, as in, NJDOT can plan $1.6 billion in projects for each year, but does not necessarily have to have the actual money on handand they didn’t. According to an analysis by the Office of Legislative Services, there is a $700 million gap between the funding sources and the appropriations due to a “reduction in appropriations from the sales tax and the diversion of planned Turnpike Authority funds to New Jersey Transit’s operating budget.” Governor Christie tried to make up for that diversion with additional bonding, but still came up about $700 million shy over the life of the plan.

If New Jersey doesn’t soon find a solution, NJDOT may need to cancel projects that have already been authorized. According to NJDOT Commissioner Jamie Fox  perhaps the most candid member of Christie’s cabinet — if the legislature does nothing to replenish the TTF before July 1, 2016, the State will hit a wall which will result in drastic cuts. “We are in a crisis,” Fox told the Senate Budget Committee, and we couldn’t agree more.

Share This Post on Social
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

13 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
trackback

[…] Tri-State Transportation Campaign issued the warning Thursday, based on it’s analysis of Gov. Chris Christie’s five-year plan to reauthorize the […]

trackback

[…] Transit riders — Governor Chris Christie’s failed five-year transportation funding scheme is going to cost NJ Transit riders 9 […]

trackback

[…] How’s the five-year Capital Program working out? You know, the one that relies increasingly more on cash and less on debt? Tell it like it is! […]

trackback

[…] FY2016 deficit stems from an overall transportation funding crisis in New […]

trackback

[…] all traffic fatalities are bicyclists or pedestrians, elected officials would rather continue to rely on debt and transit fare hikes than raise the nation’s second lowest gas tax. Is it any surprise the […]

trackback

[…] West Windsor Mayor Shing-Fu Hsueh, Princeton Mayor Liz Lempert, Pennington Borough Administrator Eileen Heinzel, Hopewell Township Mayor Harvey Lester, Hopewell Borough Mayor Paul Anzano and East Windsor Mayor Janice Mironov — The leaders of the six Mercer County, NJ municipalities are urging the legislature and governor to work together to solve the state’s transportation funding crisis. […]

trackback

[…] Jersey Transit, facing a $60 million budget deficit for FY2016 (stemming from an overall transportation funding crisis in the state), recently announced a proposed 9 percent fare hike, and the anger is […]

trackback

[…] transportation funding structure in New Jersey is broken, both on the capital side and on the operating side. This has resulted in the pillaging of other revenue streams, increased […]

trackback

[…] of political will to even address the funding crisis–especially considering the TTF will go bankrupt by the end of the fiscal year–is unfortunately also old […]

trackback

[…] fast and loose with the Garden State’s transportation funding structure since announcing his 5-year capital plan in 2011. While it looked great on paper, without dedicated revenue to support it the plan was DOA. […]

trackback

[…] Christie did mention his previous five-year capital program, he did not include the fact that FY2016 is the last year funded. In FY2017, all the dedicated […]

trackback

[…] Many, including Tri-State, feared the governor’s five-year capital program would fail, and it did in its second year. Since then, legislative leadership has reassured the members of their […]

trackback

[…] deal is better than no solution, but it is a disappointing outcome given the years of warning that preceded the TTF insolvency and the stagnant transportation investment that has characterized […]

13
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x