Archives
Categories

With Gateway Years Away, Trans-Hudson Bus Capacity Needed Now

How do you transport more people between New Jersey and Manhattan when the existing tunnels are at capacity and “one of the biggest public policy blunders in New Jersey’s history” brought the last tunnel project, Access to the Region’s Core (ARC), to a screeching halt?

One long-term solution is to try again, and that’s exactly what Amtrak is doing with the Gateway Tunnel, a plan that took an important step forward last week when the MTA resolved to preserve a right-of-way beneath Hudson Yards for the tunnel.  While it does not add as much capacity or as many direct connections as ARC would have, the tunnel would accommodate an additional 13 NJ Transit trains and eight Amtrak trains into New York City per hour. But the project isn’t expected to be completed until 2025. Commuters can’t wait another 12 years for more transit between Manhattan and New Jersey, which is why the need for additional bus lanes in the Lincoln Tunnel remains a pressing priority for New Jersey commuters.

The Lincoln Tunnel’s current Exclusive Bus Lane (XBL), the busiest bus lane in the country, transforms a westbound traffic lane into an eastbound bus-only lane between 6:15 and 10 a.m. While it has added much-needed trans-Hudson transit capacity to the tunnel, today the XBL accommodates more than three times as many daily buses as it did in 1971, its first full year of operation. On top of that, there’s no exclusive bus lane in the afternoon/evening rush hour, even though New York Metropolitan Transportation Council (NYMTC) data show that about as many bus commuters leave Manhattan via the Lincoln Tunnel during the evening rush as the number that arrive in Manhattan during the morning rush.

The Port Authority of New York & New Jersey (PANYNJ) must increase capacity for buses in the Lincoln Tunnel, in the mornings as well as in the evenings. But additional bus-only or bus/HOV lanes in the Lincoln Tunnel will only take commuters so far — literally. The Port Authority Bus Terminal (PABT), where more than one in 10 buses leave late, is already bursting at the seams, so adding capacity in the Lincoln Tunnel won’t do much good if there’s no space for buses once they arrive in Manhattan.

The deferral of PABT’s expansion means that bus commuters will have to deal with the congestion and long commutes until funding for this project becomes a priority. In the meantime, the City and the Port Authority must identify new locations for bus parking and for passenger pick-up and drop-off in the vicinity of PABT — but not, of course, without community input — to allow for more bus capacity before the terminal’s expansion is complete.

While PANYNJ’s construction program, announced last week, does not include an expanded bus terminal, it may be coming in the next capital plan.

The [public-private] partnership will free up Port Authority capital needed for other projects in its long-term capital plan, which will be unveiled later this year. [PANYNJ Executive Director Patrick] Foye said it will “be robust.”

Just how robust will the next capital plan be? We’ll have to wait until later this year to find out. If the currently-underway construction on the lesser-known George Washington Bridge Bus Station, which handles about five percent of cross-Hudson bus commuter traffic, is any indication of PANYNJ’s future priorities, then there’s reason to be optimistic.

 

Share This Post on Social
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

12 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Max Power
Max Power
10 years ago

I don’t think killing ARC was such a huge blunder. Christie may have done so just to burnish his credentials as a “fiscal conservative,” but there were real problems with the design, not the least of which was that the lack of connection to Penn Station meant that it would not work as a back up for the existing tubes.

What I don’t understand is that the PRR planned for 2 additional tubes when they built the original ones. Why haven’t they used those plans for ARC or Gateway?

trackback

[…] MTR: With Trans-Hudson Rail Improvements Years Away, P.A. Needs Bus Capacity Increases Soon […]

RJ
RJ
10 years ago

When is Tri-State going to stop flogging that dead horse known as the ARC project? When commuters discovered the truth about ARC, they turned against it. ARC was a total dog in terms of connectivity and a pig in terms of draining the NJ treasury. Gateway is a much better project than ARC, even if it doesn’t make it over to the East Side. Find out the facts and give it a rest.

DAVE KLEPPER
10 years ago

Why not increase PATH capacity by most modern signalling under computer control and running uptown trains to Newark as well as the existing WTC trains to Newark. The reversal pocket capacity problem at Newark can be handled by hostler motorman at Newark and crews from Manhatan picking up eastbound trains there. This should free up some space for passengers boarding at Secaucus.

Jeryites working at locations south of 30th St. could benefit by one change at Newark instead of a walk from Penn Station to local NY transportation.

And of course extend the No. 7 line to Secaucus. Or to a bus transfer station.

trackback

[…] for New York City, whose NYC Jobs Blueprint calls for “additional cross-Hudson solutions, improved airport access and regional freight movement, Bus Rapid Transit, and consideration of […]

trackback

[…] hours. The project will likely add to long commuting times for drivers, add passengers to already bursting-at-the-seam transit systems and increase the wear and tear on the local roadways. Unfortunately, NJDOT has yet […]

trackback

[…] 1971. But a westbound XBL during the evening rush has yet to be introduced, even though there are nearly as many westbound afternoon bus commuters using the Lincoln Tunnel as there are eastbound morning bus […]

trackback

[…] projects, such as the construction of a new bus garage or the creation of a westbound afternoon exclusive bus lane (XBL) in the Lincoln Tunnel, and not just for Super Bowl fans. A new garage was dropped in 2009 […]

trackback

[…] transportation system. But with the Access to the Region’s Core project cancelled, the Gateway Tunnel years away and a bankrupt Transportation Trust Fund, cross-Hudson rail users shouldn’t expect any relief […]

trackback

[…] the Region has been reporting on increased development, commuter and pedestrian activity in the area west of Midtown Manhattan for several years now, but with […]

trackback

[…] many via the Lincoln Tunnel XBL, the only dedicated bus lane connecting to Manhattan. But it only operates during the a.m. rush — even though just about as many people leave Manhattan to head back to New Jersey in the […]

trackback

[…] The PABT was built in 1950 at a cost of $24 million (approximately $67 million in today’s dollars), but quickly reached operating capacity by 1966, necessitating subsequent expansions. Today, the terminal is again operating above capacity, handling over 230,000 riders per day, with demand projected to grow to 330,000 by 2040. This is not a new issue. In fact, Tri-State has been sounding the alarm about cross-Hudson bus capacity since last decade. […]

12
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x