What Will Connecticut’s “Plan B” Budget Mean for Transportation?

The possible collapse of an agreement between Connecticut and its state employee unions has created tremendous uncertainty around the state budget. While the state employees’ coalition has postponed any action on contract concessions which would be necessary for Connecticut to balance its budget, Governor Malloy has given no indication that he will back down from moving forward with a “Plan B” budget that could result in thousands of layoffs and spending cuts that are even deeper than were adopted under the initial budget agreement. This can’t bode well for ensuring that Connecticut’s road, bridge and transit infrastructure are maintained in a state of good repair.

Earlier versions of the "Plan B" budget included severe transit cuts.

Unfortunately, the details of the Governor’s original “Plan B” budget are devastating to transportation in Connecticut; that proposal included rail and bus fare increases, the elimination of the Shore Line East rail service and the Metro-North branch lines, the elimination of Town Aid for Road grants and the elimination of Hartford Express bus service. Thus far, however, no decisions have been made.

[Update: Gov. Malloy’s office tells MTR that the Special Transportation Fund would see a reduction of $104 million in 2012 and $120 million in 2013. ConnDOT sees reduction of 817 staff and reduction of $78,339,774 in 2012 and $83,104,251 in 2013. How to reach these targets is up to the commissioner.]

According to a statement from the Governor’s office, “…Gov. Malloy was hopeful that the unions would ratify the agreement, he also had to be prepared if they did not. Last week Gov. Malloy directed his Secretary of OPM (Office of Policy and Management) to begin crafting a proposal that would fill the $1.6 billion deficit our budget now contains, including layoffs and cuts to programs and services. That work remains ongoing and will be finalized in the next day or two. Gov. Malloy is constitutionally obligated to have a balanced budget and that’s what we’ll have.”

As Governor Malloy begins this work, he should remember that investment in transit and transportation infrastructure are routinely found to create the most jobs per dollar expended.  In this time of crisis, innovative thinking is needed as a way to ensure that the state can get the greatest bang for its limited buck.

One way to do this is to protect funding for, and ideally invest more robustly in, bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure.  Notwithstanding research showing that these investments are needed from a safety perspective, a recent study shows that investment in bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure creates the most jobs per $1 million invested.

Continued support for transit service will also play a key role in ensuring that Connecticut can protect the most vulnerable and that laid off employees have an affordable transportation option to get around the state and look for new jobs.

Photo: Flickr/AmtrakFanNEC927.

 

Bookmark and Share

4 comments to What Will Connecticut’s “Plan B” Budget Mean for Transportation?

  • Gee, maybe they should take some of the money from the busway boondoggle and put it to use here? Ya think?

  • Gimme a Break

    Pretty funny, Jeff. But you know what’s really funny? When you’re talking about capital funding, that’s really not part of this budget. There is no state operating money in the two-year budget for the busway. There is very minimal debt service that would be saved, but any of that is 80% federal reimbursable. As Tri-State states over and over, transportation infrastructure is an investment. Killing the busway will allow $266M of discretionary federal money to be sent to Utah or Florida or Texas, and won’t do a thing to balance the two-year budget.

  • Ann Onimus

    Gimme a Break: You’re only half right. The State is still responsible for 20% of the cost of the busway. Abandoning the project would free up those approximately for $115 million, plus financing costs, for other uses, be it transportation projects, other projects, or just reducing indebtedness.

    Of course, if the State’s going to be canceling major projects of questionable merit, then the recently- and hastily-resurrected Route 11 extension should be at the top of the list, far ahead of the busway.

  • […] residents continue to grapple with the ramifications of the state’s “Plan B” budget, released after a $1.6 billion cost-saving agreement between the state and its employee unions fell […]

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>