Archives
Categories

Cross-Hudson Bus Service a Worthy Landing Spot for ARC Funding

Yesterday Governor Christie announced the end of the ARC Tunnel, which would have doubled train service across the Hudson River and reduced congestion. ARC will remain a goal for the region, but the loss of federal money means it’s unlikely to be built for at least another generation.

Now many are asking, what’s going to happen to the ARC money? The $3 billion federal “New Starts” share is lost, to be spent in another state on another project. Politicians and commentators from Los Angeles, Baltimore, Washington, NYC and beyond have been eyeing the money for weeks. New Jersey’s money is rumored to replenish the state’s broader transportation program.

The Port Authority will hold on to its $3 billion, however, and spending that money on cross-Hudson bus improvements could help commuters mourning the loss of ARC. A few back-of-the-envelope calculations help explain how.

Whether ARC is built or not, trans-Hudson commuting into and out of Manhattan is expected to increase by 25 percent by 2030, according to NJ Transit’s numbers.

According to ARC’s final Environmental Impact Statement, the project would have shifted daily 11,530 trans-Hudson bus trips and 31,590 trans-Hudson car trips to rail by 2030.  Assuming an average bus capacity of 35 passengers, more than 1,230 additional buses will be needed to meet that demand in the absence of ARC. Another 473 buses will be needed to accommodate the baseline projected increase of 16,538 bus trips that would occur even with the tunnel. That’s another 1,703 buses needed by 2030 to accommodate this growth in cross-Hudson trips.

Currently, NJ Transit has a total of 2,125 buses statewide. If half of new trips are on NJ Transit buses (with the other half on private carriers), the agency would have to increase its existing bus fleet by at least 850 buses, or 40%. That’s a major investment.

And with the Lincoln Tunnel’s Express Bus Lane and the Port Authority Bus Terminal (PABT) already at or near capacity, there’s just no way for the existing infrastructure to accommodate 1,703 more buses.  As the ARC project’s final environmental impact statement points out, “bus service levels would remain the same as existing conditions… due to capacity limitations at PABT.”  In other words, drastic improvements are necessary to allow more buses to enter Manhattan. Luckily, the Port Authority is already considering plans to increase bus capacity through the Lincoln Tunnel and at the PABT. (For more ideas about improving bus service across the Hudson, see TSTC and Streetfilms’s video from 2008.)

But implementing those plans will require potentially controversial things like creating more exclusive bus lanes into and out of the Lincoln Tunnel. So the question remains whether Governor Christie will encourage these plans, or make more decisions that leave commuters stuck in traffic.

Share This Post on Social
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

6 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
trackback

[…] …While Tri-State Makes the Case for Using It to Improve Cross-Hudson Bus Service (MTR) […]

trackback

[…] as well, and the Tri-State Transportation Campaign has a solution: Spend some of the money on improving cross-Hudson bus service. Here’s their thinking: According to ARC’s final Environmental Impact Statement, the […]

Richard Rabinowitz
Richard Rabinowitz
14 years ago

Bus-and-ferry. That’s what the Trans-Hudson Emergency plan suggested in trains recently (you’d take a bus to the river and then board a ferry across it). Also, subsidize rail ferry services from Hoboken and Port Imperial and perhaps Liberty State Park. That’s probably cheaper than the tunnel version of ARC.

Arthur Fliegelman
Arthur Fliegelman
14 years ago

Bus service has long been the “forgotten man” with all the attention the trains have gotten. It is also much more flexible in where it originates and where it lets commuters off. For example in my town in New Jersey, buses take NY bound commuters to downtown Manhattan, the PABT, crosstown on 42nd St to the UN, and bus to Jersey City that many NY commuters used to get to the PATH to NY. Other locations could also be easily added when and if appropriate. Improvements in the PABT and downtown in particular are badly needed. Getting into the Holland Tunnel in the PM is a nightmare for a bus. Sometimes that alone is half the trip home.

Douglas A. Willinger
14 years ago

Was not the Lincoln Tunnel designed to have a 4th tube?

If so, what would that cost?

trackback

[…] Cross-Hudson Bus Service a Worthy Landing Spot for ARC Funding | Mobilizing the Region. […]

6
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x