<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ConnDOT Can Fill Gaps in Complete Streets Legislation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.tstc.org/2009/06/19/conndot-can-fill-gaps-in-complete-streets-legislation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.tstc.org/2009/06/19/conndot-can-fill-gaps-in-complete-streets-legislation/</link>
	<description>News and opinion from the Tri-State Transportation Campaign</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:36:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gov. Rell Signs Complete Streets Bill Into Law &#171; Mobilizing the Region</title>
		<link>http://blog.tstc.org/2009/06/19/conndot-can-fill-gaps-in-complete-streets-legislation/comment-page-1/#comment-1288</link>
		<dc:creator>Gov. Rell Signs Complete Streets Bill Into Law &#171; Mobilizing the Region</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 00:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tstc.org/?p=5433#comment-1288</guid>
		<description>[...] it is now up to ConnDOT to fill a gap in the bill, the removal of a provision from the original legislative draft that would have [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it is now up to ConnDOT to fill a gap in the bill, the removal of a provision from the original legislative draft that would have [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Haven Safe Stree</title>
		<link>http://blog.tstc.org/2009/06/19/conndot-can-fill-gaps-in-complete-streets-legislation/comment-page-1/#comment-1289</link>
		<dc:creator>New Haven Safe Stree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tstc.org/?p=5433#comment-1289</guid>
		<description>Great post!  This is a great idea, which everyone should be able to support.

I would argue that the HSIP funds should be more than 10-12%, however, given the related factors that are arguably even more important than statistical &quot;safety&quot; itself: walkability, economic growth, public health, environmental sustainability, and the reduction of the state&#039;s serious health disparities.

Perhaps the CT Department of Public Health could write a letter to help frame the priorities in a way that ConnDOT&#039;s engineers would understand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post!  This is a great idea, which everyone should be able to support.</p>
<p>I would argue that the HSIP funds should be more than 10-12%, however, given the related factors that are arguably even more important than statistical &#8220;safety&#8221; itself: walkability, economic growth, public health, environmental sustainability, and the reduction of the state&#8217;s serious health disparities.</p>
<p>Perhaps the CT Department of Public Health could write a letter to help frame the priorities in a way that ConnDOT&#8217;s engineers would understand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

