<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 40% Fare Increase Wrong Way to Balance CT Budget: Elected Officials, Advocates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.tstc.org/2009/06/15/40-fare-increase-wrong-way-to-balance-ct-budget-elected-officials-advocates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.tstc.org/2009/06/15/40-fare-increase-wrong-way-to-balance-ct-budget-elected-officials-advocates/</link>
	<description>News and opinion from the Tri-State Transportation Campaign</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:36:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Connecticut Fare Hike Fight Continues &#171; Mobilizing the Region</title>
		<link>http://blog.tstc.org/2009/06/15/40-fare-increase-wrong-way-to-balance-ct-budget-elected-officials-advocates/comment-page-1/#comment-1280</link>
		<dc:creator>Connecticut Fare Hike Fight Continues &#171; Mobilizing the Region</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 13:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tstc.org/?p=5360#comment-1280</guid>
		<description>[...] a budget without bus fare increases, a victory for transit advocates in Connecticut who have been fighting the governor&#8217;s proposed 40% fare hike on CT Transit buses and 10% fare hike on Metro-North [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a budget without bus fare increases, a victory for transit advocates in Connecticut who have been fighting the governor&#8217;s proposed 40% fare hike on CT Transit buses and 10% fare hike on Metro-North [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DingDong</title>
		<link>http://blog.tstc.org/2009/06/15/40-fare-increase-wrong-way-to-balance-ct-budget-elected-officials-advocates/comment-page-1/#comment-1279</link>
		<dc:creator>DingDong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 01:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tstc.org/?p=5360#comment-1279</guid>
		<description>Time to get rid of Rell.  She hates cities and poor people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time to get rid of Rell.  She hates cities and poor people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Higashide</title>
		<link>http://blog.tstc.org/2009/06/15/40-fare-increase-wrong-way-to-balance-ct-budget-elected-officials-advocates/comment-page-1/#comment-1277</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Higashide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 21:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tstc.org/?p=5360#comment-1277</guid>
		<description>James, I believe the &quot;bailout&quot; 10% Metro-North fare increase applies only to fares within New York. It does not affect Connecticut riders unless they purchase a ticket onboard the train. (The MTA board sets fares only within New York.)

However, Rell&#039;s proposed 10% fare increase for trips beginning or ending in Connecticut is on top of already scheduled Connecticut fare increases - 1.25% in 2010 and 1% increases every year from 2011 to 2016.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James, I believe the &#8220;bailout&#8221; 10% Metro-North fare increase applies only to fares within New York. It does not affect Connecticut riders unless they purchase a ticket onboard the train. (The MTA board sets fares only within New York.)</p>
<p>However, Rell&#8217;s proposed 10% fare increase for trips beginning or ending in Connecticut is on top of already scheduled Connecticut fare increases &#8211; 1.25% in 2010 and 1% increases every year from 2011 to 2016.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://blog.tstc.org/2009/06/15/40-fare-increase-wrong-way-to-balance-ct-budget-elected-officials-advocates/comment-page-1/#comment-1278</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 14:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tstc.org/?p=5360#comment-1278</guid>
		<description>The Rell spokesman&#039;s response re: the 40% bus fare hike was sickeningly callous and regressive. I&#039;m curious, though: would the proposed 10% Metro North fare hike within CT be on top of the forthcoming 10% fare hike for Metro North that is a component of the recent bailout plain?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Rell spokesman&#8217;s response re: the 40% bus fare hike was sickeningly callous and regressive. I&#8217;m curious, though: would the proposed 10% Metro North fare hike within CT be on top of the forthcoming 10% fare hike for Metro North that is a component of the recent bailout plain?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

