<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Feds Open &quot;Portal&quot; to Expansion of NJ Transit&#039;s Network</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.tstc.org/2009/01/08/feds-open-portal-to-expansion-of-nj-transits-network/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.tstc.org/2009/01/08/feds-open-portal-to-expansion-of-nj-transits-network/</link>
	<description>News and opinion from the Tri-State Transportation Campaign</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:36:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amtrak Tries Picking Up the ARC Pieces With &#8220;Gateway Project&#8221; &#124; Mobilizing the Region</title>
		<link>http://blog.tstc.org/2009/01/08/feds-open-portal-to-expansion-of-nj-transits-network/comment-page-1/#comment-32536</link>
		<dc:creator>Amtrak Tries Picking Up the ARC Pieces With &#8220;Gateway Project&#8221; &#124; Mobilizing the Region</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 19:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tstc.org/?p=2832#comment-32536</guid>
		<description>[...] This morning, NJ&#8217;s Senators Frank Lautenberg and Robert Menendez joined Amtrak President Joseph Boardman to make the exciting announcement that Amtrak will try to take the lead on a new trans-Hudson rail project, the &#8220;Gateway Project.&#8221; The agency has proposed a $50 million engineering study that will take advantage of the work done for the ARC Tunnel. It says the project can be completed as early as 2020, at an estimated cost of $13.5 billion (which includes the cost of replacing the Portal Bridge). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This morning, NJ&#8217;s Senators Frank Lautenberg and Robert Menendez joined Amtrak President Joseph Boardman to make the exciting announcement that Amtrak will try to take the lead on a new trans-Hudson rail project, the &#8220;Gateway Project.&#8221; The agency has proposed a $50 million engineering study that will take advantage of the work done for the ARC Tunnel. It says the project can be completed as early as 2020, at an estimated cost of $13.5 billion (which includes the cost of replacing the Portal Bridge). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Streetsblog New York City &#187; Public Hearing on Critical East Coast Greenway Link in Northern New Jersey</title>
		<link>http://blog.tstc.org/2009/01/08/feds-open-portal-to-expansion-of-nj-transits-network/comment-page-1/#comment-3437</link>
		<dc:creator>Streetsblog New York City &#187; Public Hearing on Critical East Coast Greenway Link in Northern New Jersey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 22:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tstc.org/?p=2832#comment-3437</guid>
		<description>[...] Transit is building 2 new rail bridges across the Hackensack River (a “north” span and a “south” span adjacent to the current [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Transit is building 2 new rail bridges across the Hackensack River (a “north” span and a “south” span adjacent to the current [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: East Coast Greenway: Feb. 10 Hearing is Chance For Critical North Jersey Link &#124; Mobilizing the Region</title>
		<link>http://blog.tstc.org/2009/01/08/feds-open-portal-to-expansion-of-nj-transits-network/comment-page-1/#comment-3405</link>
		<dc:creator>East Coast Greenway: Feb. 10 Hearing is Chance For Critical North Jersey Link &#124; Mobilizing the Region</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 17:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tstc.org/?p=2832#comment-3405</guid>
		<description>[...] Transit is building 2 new rail bridges across the Hackensack River (a “north” span and a “south” span adjacent to the current [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Transit is building 2 new rail bridges across the Hackensack River (a “north” span and a “south” span adjacent to the current [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New England Advocates Get Behind Connecticut High Speed Rail &#171; Mobilizing the Region</title>
		<link>http://blog.tstc.org/2009/01/08/feds-open-portal-to-expansion-of-nj-transits-network/comment-page-1/#comment-943</link>
		<dc:creator>New England Advocates Get Behind Connecticut High Speed Rail &#171; Mobilizing the Region</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 19:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tstc.org/?p=2832#comment-943</guid>
		<description>[...] a project that will ease capacity constraints on the Northeast Corridor and allow the state to recognize the full benefit of the Access to the Region&#8217;s Core rail [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a project that will ease capacity constraints on the Northeast Corridor and allow the state to recognize the full benefit of the Access to the Region&#8217;s Core rail [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clark Morris</title>
		<link>http://blog.tstc.org/2009/01/08/feds-open-portal-to-expansion-of-nj-transits-network/comment-page-1/#comment-942</link>
		<dc:creator>Clark Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 20:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tstc.org/?p=2832#comment-942</guid>
		<description>The Portal Bridge project as designed should never have been approved.  A 4 track fixed bridge and NO movable bridge would have made sense.  This seems to be symptomatic of the ARC.  The tunnel to an expensive and cramped station that has NO connection to either the East River tunnels or Grand Central Terminal is another part.

If the movable bridge is needed for the Kearney Yard, move the Kearney Yard.  If it is needed for connecting the Bergen County lines to the Northeast Corridor via the proposed circuitous connection, revise the connection to be more direct and have fewer grades (this assumes any connection of the Bergen County lines to Penn Station via Secaucus makes sense).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Portal Bridge project as designed should never have been approved.  A 4 track fixed bridge and NO movable bridge would have made sense.  This seems to be symptomatic of the ARC.  The tunnel to an expensive and cramped station that has NO connection to either the East River tunnels or Grand Central Terminal is another part.</p>
<p>If the movable bridge is needed for the Kearney Yard, move the Kearney Yard.  If it is needed for connecting the Bergen County lines to the Northeast Corridor via the proposed circuitous connection, revise the connection to be more direct and have fewer grades (this assumes any connection of the Bergen County lines to Penn Station via Secaucus makes sense).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

