<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Groups, Electeds: CT Must Put Rail Project on Fast Track</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.tstc.org/2008/12/11/groups-electeds-ct-must-put-rail-project-on-fast-track/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.tstc.org/2008/12/11/groups-electeds-ct-must-put-rail-project-on-fast-track/</link>
	<description>News and opinion from the Tri-State Transportation Campaign</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:36:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: $121M More in Federal Support for New Haven-Springfield Line &#124; Mobilizing the Region</title>
		<link>http://blog.tstc.org/2008/12/11/groups-electeds-ct-must-put-rail-project-on-fast-track/comment-page-1/#comment-19622</link>
		<dc:creator>$121M More in Federal Support for New Haven-Springfield Line &#124; Mobilizing the Region</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tstc.org/?p=2541#comment-19622</guid>
		<description>[...] for the project and allowing implementation &#8212; which appeared to be stagnating as late as winter 2008 &#8212; to continue. Connecticut now has over $440 million in federal and state money lined up for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for the project and allowing implementation &#8212; which appeared to be stagnating as late as winter 2008 &#8212; to continue. Connecticut now has over $440 million in federal and state money lined up for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The More Things Change&#8230; &#171; Mobilizing the Region</title>
		<link>http://blog.tstc.org/2008/12/11/groups-electeds-ct-must-put-rail-project-on-fast-track/comment-page-1/#comment-907</link>
		<dc:creator>The More Things Change&#8230; &#171; Mobilizing the Region</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 15:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tstc.org/?p=2541#comment-907</guid>
		<description>[...] board the service a day. The bill didn&#8217;t pass that year; 14 years later advocates are still asking ConnDOT to speed up its study, though at least the planned service now runs all the way to Springfield, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] board the service a day. The bill didn&#8217;t pass that year; 14 years later advocates are still asking ConnDOT to speed up its study, though at least the planned service now runs all the way to Springfield, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Transit Advocates Urge Governor To Fast Track Rail Project &#8212; Transit Blogger</title>
		<link>http://blog.tstc.org/2008/12/11/groups-electeds-ct-must-put-rail-project-on-fast-track/comment-page-1/#comment-909</link>
		<dc:creator>Transit Advocates Urge Governor To Fast Track Rail Project &#8212; Transit Blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 09:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tstc.org/?p=2541#comment-909</guid>
		<description>[...] here for the complete [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] here for the complete [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://blog.tstc.org/2008/12/11/groups-electeds-ct-must-put-rail-project-on-fast-track/comment-page-1/#comment-908</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 21:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tstc.org/?p=2541#comment-908</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s very sad that this project has only been &quot;talk&quot; and not too much doing. The railroad has existed for years and of they state had anyone with a brain, they would have had this line running before Amtrak decided to rip out most of the double mainline from N.Haven to Enfield. The fact that nothing has even happened yet has to make you wonder if it is going to even happen. The construction would not take long at all. Your talking reinstalling the 2nd mainline, signals where they are needed and bridge and crossing work. Amtrak could provide additional trainsets until the State has thier own for this service</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s very sad that this project has only been &#8220;talk&#8221; and not too much doing. The railroad has existed for years and of they state had anyone with a brain, they would have had this line running before Amtrak decided to rip out most of the double mainline from N.Haven to Enfield. The fact that nothing has even happened yet has to make you wonder if it is going to even happen. The construction would not take long at all. Your talking reinstalling the 2nd mainline, signals where they are needed and bridge and crossing work. Amtrak could provide additional trainsets until the State has thier own for this service</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://blog.tstc.org/2008/12/11/groups-electeds-ct-must-put-rail-project-on-fast-track/comment-page-1/#comment-906</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 01:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tstc.org/?p=2541#comment-906</guid>
		<description>&quot;Currently, the state is allocating 2 years for the Environmental Assessment, a process that should take less than 12 months in any case, and much less in this case where transit has operated in the corridor for decades.&quot;

This line has been in service since the 1850s!!! I understand maybe a twelve-month delay for organization and rolling stock reasons, but if Rell really wanted this, she could have a bare-bones service running by next week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Currently, the state is allocating 2 years for the Environmental Assessment, a process that should take less than 12 months in any case, and much less in this case where transit has operated in the corridor for decades.&#8221;</p>
<p>This line has been in service since the 1850s!!! I understand maybe a twelve-month delay for organization and rolling stock reasons, but if Rell really wanted this, she could have a bare-bones service running by next week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

