<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#039;t Fear the Speed Hump</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.tstc.org/2008/07/28/dont-fear-the-speed-hump/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.tstc.org/2008/07/28/dont-fear-the-speed-hump/</link>
	<description>News and opinion from the Tri-State Transportation Campaign</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:36:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://blog.tstc.org/2008/07/28/dont-fear-the-speed-hump/comment-page-1/#comment-591</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 13:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilizingtheregion.wordpress.com/?p=511#comment-591</guid>
		<description>Tests show Speed Bumps [or &quot;Speed Humps&quot;] are bad for the planet....

Posted on &quot;autoblog&quot; by Jonathon Ramsey:

The British Automobile Association recently completed an environmental impact study using the Millbrook Proving Ground for the test, by installing temporary speed bumps at prescribed intervals, then using a test car that averages 58mpg @ a constant 30mph, then slowing down and speeding up for each bump. Fuel economy dropped to 31mpg,
The findings correlate with those of Great Britain&#039;s Transport Research Laboratory that found the level of poisonous CO Emissions rose as much as 82% and nitrous oxide emissions increased by as much as 37% on roads equipped with speed bumps.

[Source: Channel 4](UK)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tests show Speed Bumps [or "Speed Humps"] are bad for the planet&#8230;.</p>
<p>Posted on &#8220;autoblog&#8221; by Jonathon Ramsey:</p>
<p>The British Automobile Association recently completed an environmental impact study using the Millbrook Proving Ground for the test, by installing temporary speed bumps at prescribed intervals, then using a test car that averages 58mpg @ a constant 30mph, then slowing down and speeding up for each bump. Fuel economy dropped to 31mpg,<br />
The findings correlate with those of Great Britain&#8217;s Transport Research Laboratory that found the level of poisonous CO Emissions rose as much as 82% and nitrous oxide emissions increased by as much as 37% on roads equipped with speed bumps.</p>
<p>[Source: Channel 4](UK)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antonio</title>
		<link>http://blog.tstc.org/2008/07/28/dont-fear-the-speed-hump/comment-page-1/#comment-592</link>
		<dc:creator>Antonio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 17:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilizingtheregion.wordpress.com/?p=511#comment-592</guid>
		<description>James:

Some factory vehicles do have a low profile, namely being high performance sports cars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James:</p>
<p>Some factory vehicles do have a low profile, namely being high performance sports cars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://blog.tstc.org/2008/07/28/dont-fear-the-speed-hump/comment-page-1/#comment-593</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 14:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilizingtheregion.wordpress.com/?p=511#comment-593</guid>
		<description>This fear is not a legit one. The article states that the municipality is worried about lawsuits that could arise from damage to the undercarriage of cars with low profiles. The only cars which could be damaged from traffic calming infrastructure are those that are modified (&quot;dropped&quot;) to make them lower to the ground than they are from the factory. No showroom stock vehicle is going to have a problem with speed bumps or rumble strips, and a court would throw this out because no one forced the motorist to make the modifications to the vehicle in the first place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This fear is not a legit one. The article states that the municipality is worried about lawsuits that could arise from damage to the undercarriage of cars with low profiles. The only cars which could be damaged from traffic calming infrastructure are those that are modified (&#8220;dropped&#8221;) to make them lower to the ground than they are from the factory. No showroom stock vehicle is going to have a problem with speed bumps or rumble strips, and a court would throw this out because no one forced the motorist to make the modifications to the vehicle in the first place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

