<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Connecticut Metro-North and Shore Line East Ridership Up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.tstc.org/2008/04/14/connecticut-metro-north-and-shore-line-east-ridership-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.tstc.org/2008/04/14/connecticut-metro-north-and-shore-line-east-ridership-up/</link>
	<description>News and opinion from the Tri-State Transportation Campaign</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 13:08:09 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Richard Stowe</title>
		<link>http://blog.tstc.org/2008/04/14/connecticut-metro-north-and-shore-line-east-ridership-up/comment-page-1/#comment-393</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Stowe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 03:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilizingtheregion.wordpress.com/?p=268#comment-393</guid>
		<description>I just re-read my post of April 25, 2008.  My position on the New Haven-Hartford-Springfield and Waterbury to Hartford commuter train service has evolved over the past six months.  As I stated in the April 25th, 2008 post, I strongly oppose the New Britain to Hartford busway, but that corridor should not only be used for Waterbury to Hartford commuter train service, but also New York, New Haven-New Britain-Hartford-Springfield-&quot;5 colleges&quot; commuter and intercity train service.  That would avoid the need for a time transfer bus service.  That can be achieved by using the existing railroad tracks from Berlin to New Britain and in downtown New Britain building a junction, which would allow those trains to travel along the New Britain, or Newington Secondary back to the Amtrak corridor to Hartford.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just re-read my post of April 25, 2008.  My position on the New Haven-Hartford-Springfield and Waterbury to Hartford commuter train service has evolved over the past six months.  As I stated in the April 25th, 2008 post, I strongly oppose the New Britain to Hartford busway, but that corridor should not only be used for Waterbury to Hartford commuter train service, but also New York, New Haven-New Britain-Hartford-Springfield-&#8221;5 colleges&#8221; commuter and intercity train service.  That would avoid the need for a time transfer bus service.  That can be achieved by using the existing railroad tracks from Berlin to New Britain and in downtown New Britain building a junction, which would allow those trains to travel along the New Britain, or Newington Secondary back to the Amtrak corridor to Hartford.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shore Line East Expands Service to Weekends, Holidays &#171; Mobilizing the Region</title>
		<link>http://blog.tstc.org/2008/04/14/connecticut-metro-north-and-shore-line-east-ridership-up/comment-page-1/#comment-392</link>
		<dc:creator>Shore Line East Expands Service to Weekends, Holidays &#171; Mobilizing the Region</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 18:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilizingtheregion.wordpress.com/?p=268#comment-392</guid>
		<description>[...] 1,900 average weekday riders thus far in 2008, according to The Day. Earlier this year, Tri-State argued that increased transit ridership in Connecticut was due to greater investment from ConnDOT as well [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 1,900 average weekday riders thus far in 2008, according to The Day. Earlier this year, Tri-State argued that increased transit ridership in Connecticut was due to greater investment from ConnDOT as well [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rebecca</title>
		<link>http://blog.tstc.org/2008/04/14/connecticut-metro-north-and-shore-line-east-ridership-up/comment-page-1/#comment-388</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 15:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilizingtheregion.wordpress.com/?p=268#comment-388</guid>
		<description>Who will provide service on the NHHS line?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who will provide service on the NHHS line?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Stowe</title>
		<link>http://blog.tstc.org/2008/04/14/connecticut-metro-north-and-shore-line-east-ridership-up/comment-page-1/#comment-389</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Stowe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 05:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilizingtheregion.wordpress.com/?p=268#comment-389</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve ridden bus rapid transit in Los Angeles.  I really don&#039;t like BRT.

In Connecticut, we have a much more comfortable, superior and efficient version of BRT - its the New Haven Line train that makes local stops between New Haven and Stamford - all that&#039;s needed is to incorporate the New Haven State Street stop fully into the line &amp; add a few stops onto the line - West Haven, Orange, Black Rock, East Main Street in Stamford + add Greenwich Avenue (Greenwich) into that service corridor.

I strongly disagree with the concept of moving ahead with the New Britain Busway - that corridor should be developed as a train corridor, connecting Waterbury to Hartford.

All efforts should be focused on establishing a superior New Haven, Hartford &amp; Springfield Line that runs directly into NYC (that is not being planned for.) With daily service, not weekday service.

Establishing a New Haven, Hartford, Springfield Line stop on New Britain Avenue in Newington would be just  1.7 miles from New Britain.  Run a time-transfer bus from New Britain down Newington Ave. to meet the NH, H &amp; S train at New Britain Avenue.

Richard Stowe
Rail*Trains*Ecology*Cycling</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve ridden bus rapid transit in Los Angeles.  I really don&#8217;t like BRT.</p>
<p>In Connecticut, we have a much more comfortable, superior and efficient version of BRT &#8211; its the New Haven Line train that makes local stops between New Haven and Stamford &#8211; all that&#8217;s needed is to incorporate the New Haven State Street stop fully into the line &amp; add a few stops onto the line &#8211; West Haven, Orange, Black Rock, East Main Street in Stamford + add Greenwich Avenue (Greenwich) into that service corridor.</p>
<p>I strongly disagree with the concept of moving ahead with the New Britain Busway &#8211; that corridor should be developed as a train corridor, connecting Waterbury to Hartford.</p>
<p>All efforts should be focused on establishing a superior New Haven, Hartford &amp; Springfield Line that runs directly into NYC (that is not being planned for.) With daily service, not weekday service.</p>
<p>Establishing a New Haven, Hartford, Springfield Line stop on New Britain Avenue in Newington would be just  1.7 miles from New Britain.  Run a time-transfer bus from New Britain down Newington Ave. to meet the NH, H &amp; S train at New Britain Avenue.</p>
<p>Richard Stowe<br />
Rail*Trains*Ecology*Cycling</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Transit bits &#124; RailBlogr</title>
		<link>http://blog.tstc.org/2008/04/14/connecticut-metro-north-and-shore-line-east-ridership-up/comment-page-1/#comment-390</link>
		<dc:creator>Transit bits &#124; RailBlogr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 00:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilizingtheregion.wordpress.com/?p=268#comment-390</guid>
		<description>[...] Connecticut&#8217;s part of Metro-North and Shore Line East have seen an increase of 1.4 million rides since 2006. [Tri State Transportation Campaign] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Connecticut&#8217;s part of Metro-North and Shore Line East have seen an increase of 1.4 million rides since 2006. [Tri State Transportation Campaign] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave H.</title>
		<link>http://blog.tstc.org/2008/04/14/connecticut-metro-north-and-shore-line-east-ridership-up/comment-page-1/#comment-391</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 03:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilizingtheregion.wordpress.com/?p=268#comment-391</guid>
		<description>Shore Line had weekend service (for I believe the first time) in 2007 during the holiday period: thanksgiving to new years roughly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shore Line had weekend service (for I believe the first time) in 2007 during the holiday period: thanksgiving to new years roughly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Cairl</title>
		<link>http://blog.tstc.org/2008/04/14/connecticut-metro-north-and-shore-line-east-ridership-up/comment-page-1/#comment-385</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Cairl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 17:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilizingtheregion.wordpress.com/?p=268#comment-385</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s not forget completing replacement of the old overhead catenary system between Stamford and New Haven, a step that greatly improves reliability of service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s not forget completing replacement of the old overhead catenary system between Stamford and New Haven, a step that greatly improves reliability of service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vnm</title>
		<link>http://blog.tstc.org/2008/04/14/connecticut-metro-north-and-shore-line-east-ridership-up/comment-page-1/#comment-384</link>
		<dc:creator>vnm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 23:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilizingtheregion.wordpress.com/?p=268#comment-384</guid>
		<description>Shore Line East has weekend service?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shore Line East has weekend service?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Streetsblog &#187; Today&#8217;s Headlines</title>
		<link>http://blog.tstc.org/2008/04/14/connecticut-metro-north-and-shore-line-east-ridership-up/comment-page-1/#comment-383</link>
		<dc:creator>Streetsblog &#187; Today&#8217;s Headlines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 13:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilizingtheregion.wordpress.com/?p=268#comment-383</guid>
		<description>[...] on Popelock (City Room)Range of Reactions to CT Bike Bill (Bike Commute Tips)CT Rail Ridership Up (MTR)      Filed by Ben Fried under Today&#039;s Headlines    Link Digg This Email [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on Popelock (City Room)Range of Reactions to CT Bike Bill (Bike Commute Tips)CT Rail Ridership Up (MTR)      Filed by Ben Fried under Today&#8217;s Headlines    Link Digg This Email [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Ernst</title>
		<link>http://blog.tstc.org/2008/04/14/connecticut-metro-north-and-shore-line-east-ridership-up/comment-page-1/#comment-387</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Ernst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 14:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilizingtheregion.wordpress.com/?p=268#comment-387</guid>
		<description>Dave --
Preliminary estimates from FHWA&#039;s Traffic Volume Trends (http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ohim/tvtw/tvtpage.htm) show statewide VMT dropping very slightly from 2006 to 2007.  The Campaign will keep on the lookout for final VMT numbers to see if these early numbers point to a real downward trend in driving here and throughout the region.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave &#8211;<br />
Preliminary estimates from FHWA&#8217;s Traffic Volume Trends (<a href="http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ohim/tvtw/tvtpage.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ohim/tvtw/tvtpage.htm</a>) show statewide VMT dropping very slightly from 2006 to 2007.  The Campaign will keep on the lookout for final VMT numbers to see if these early numbers point to a real downward trend in driving here and throughout the region.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
