Last week Governor M. Jodi Rell announced a dramatic jump in Connecticut rail ridership in 2007 — a combined increase of nearly 1.4 million riders on Metro-North and Shore Line East over 2006.
According to the Governor’s press release and subsequent news reports (The Day and Stamford Advocate), 2007 ridership on the state-run Shore Line East service rose by 5.5% over 2006 ridership levels, an increase of more than 25,000 trips. This trend has continued through the first two months of 2008 with more than 6,000 additional trips, or an 8.8% increase, over the same time period last year.
Broadly, Metro-North ridership increased significantly as well, logging nearly 4% increased ridership. The New Haven line, one of the busiest commuter lines in the nation, added 1.3 million more passengers in the one year period.
While trips that began or ended at Grand Central Terminal rose 10% in the first two months of this year, the greatest increase in ridership was reserved for those passengers traveling within Connecticut. According to the ConnDOT figures, intra-Connecticut ridership rose an astounding 11.5% during the month of February alone. For the year 2007, intrastate ridership rose 7%.
Is the state’s investment in mass transit finally paying dividends, or are people just fed up with higher gas prices that show no indication of ebbing? The price of gas in Connecticut has hit all-time highs as of this writing and surely has had some impact on transit use. However, these ridership increases could also reflect ConnDOT’s increased investment in its mass transit system. Connecticut’s 2007-2010 State Transportation Improvement Plan (STIP), the blueprint for transportation spending in the state, funds mass transit by nearly 10% over 2000-2002 levels.
And that’s not all. The addition of a Metro-North Waterbury Branch peak morning train at ConnDOT’s request, decisions to rehab existing train car infrastructure, the arrival of state-of-the-art M8 trains in 2009, and increased weekend service on Shore Line East are all recent moves by the state to increase transit capacity. However, ConnDOT and the State must continue to increase capacity of existing services and need to move quickly in other areas to keep up with even further transit demand.
This can be done by implementing the following measures:
Fast Track the Transportation Strategy Board’s Congestion Pricing Study: The State of Connecticut desperately needs a new source of transportation dollars, as well as a congestion mitigation tool. Fast tracking this study will continue to move this measure forward and ensure that Connecticut does not backslide on congestion pricing implementation, as it has done for so many years. New York City was denied an opportunity to become the regional model for traffic mitigation. Now, Connecticut has an opportunity to become the standard bearer.
The Assembly Should Pass and Fully Fund House Bill 5734: This bill, calling for new and expanded bus transportation services, would provide mass transit service to under-served populations throughout the state and increase capacity in areas with existing service.
Implement and Move Forward with High Profile Mass Transit Projects: ConnDOT must continue to move forward with implementation of the New Haven-Hartford-Springfield Commuter Rail and the New Britain-Hartford Busway. ConnDOT sees these projects as the vanguard of a 21st-century transportation system. That is difficult to do if no progress is made on implementation. In addition, ConnDOT should support the South Western Regional Planning Agency’s (SWRPA) Bus Rapid Transit study along the Route 1 corridor.
[…] on Popelock (City Room)Range of Reactions to CT Bike Bill (Bike Commute Tips)CT Rail Ridership Up (MTR) Filed by Ben Fried under Today’s Headlines Link Digg This Email […]
Shore Line East has weekend service?
Let’s not forget completing replacement of the old overhead catenary system between Stamford and New Haven, a step that greatly improves reliability of service.
Good news, of course. But are VMT going down in Connecticut?
Dave —
Preliminary estimates from FHWA’s Traffic Volume Trends (http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ohim/tvtw/tvtpage.htm) show statewide VMT dropping very slightly from 2006 to 2007. The Campaign will keep on the lookout for final VMT numbers to see if these early numbers point to a real downward trend in driving here and throughout the region.
Who will provide service on the NHHS line?
I’ve ridden bus rapid transit in Los Angeles. I really don’t like BRT.
In Connecticut, we have a much more comfortable, superior and efficient version of BRT – its the New Haven Line train that makes local stops between New Haven and Stamford – all that’s needed is to incorporate the New Haven State Street stop fully into the line & add a few stops onto the line – West Haven, Orange, Black Rock, East Main Street in Stamford + add Greenwich Avenue (Greenwich) into that service corridor.
I strongly disagree with the concept of moving ahead with the New Britain Busway – that corridor should be developed as a train corridor, connecting Waterbury to Hartford.
All efforts should be focused on establishing a superior New Haven, Hartford & Springfield Line that runs directly into NYC (that is not being planned for.) With daily service, not weekday service.
Establishing a New Haven, Hartford, Springfield Line stop on New Britain Avenue in Newington would be just 1.7 miles from New Britain. Run a time-transfer bus from New Britain down Newington Ave. to meet the NH, H & S train at New Britain Avenue.
Richard Stowe
Rail*Trains*Ecology*Cycling
[…] Connecticut’s part of Metro-North and Shore Line East have seen an increase of 1.4 million rides since 2006. [Tri State Transportation Campaign] […]
Shore Line had weekend service (for I believe the first time) in 2007 during the holiday period: thanksgiving to new years roughly.
[…] 1,900 average weekday riders thus far in 2008, according to The Day. Earlier this year, Tri-State argued that increased transit ridership in Connecticut was due to greater investment from ConnDOT as well […]
I just re-read my post of April 25, 2008. My position on the New Haven-Hartford-Springfield and Waterbury to Hartford commuter train service has evolved over the past six months. As I stated in the April 25th, 2008 post, I strongly oppose the New Britain to Hartford busway, but that corridor should not only be used for Waterbury to Hartford commuter train service, but also New York, New Haven-New Britain-Hartford-Springfield-“5 colleges” commuter and intercity train service. That would avoid the need for a time transfer bus service. That can be achieved by using the existing railroad tracks from Berlin to New Britain and in downtown New Britain building a junction, which would allow those trains to travel along the New Britain, or Newington Secondary back to the Amtrak corridor to Hartford.