<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In Search of a Rational Toll Policy for the Tappan Zee Bridge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.tstc.org/2007/11/26/in-search-of-a-rational-toll-policy-for-the-tappan-zee-bridge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.tstc.org/2007/11/26/in-search-of-a-rational-toll-policy-for-the-tappan-zee-bridge/</link>
	<description>News and opinion from the Tri-State Transportation Campaign</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:36:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph Braskett</title>
		<link>http://blog.tstc.org/2007/11/26/in-search-of-a-rational-toll-policy-for-the-tappan-zee-bridge/comment-page-1/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph Braskett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 05:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tstc.org/2007/11/26/in-search-of-a-rational-toll-policy-for-the-tappan-zee-bridge/#comment-53</guid>
		<description>Your concept is right on target.  Can you quantify the driver shifts you discuss?
How much of a toll increase on peak drivers-assuming non-peak will remain at current levels-will go into a replacement tunnel/bridge
capital fund, which Albany can&#039;t grab for pork?
You must give the peak driver some hope of a better future or even a future if the current
bridge is NOT replaced in 10-20 years; maybe sooner?  If they go with a tunnel, light rail should be considered with easy transfers to MNRR lines + bus shuttles to/from LRT in Rockland and Westchester &amp; relatively light vehicles(like PCC streetcars) for easy route deviations for RR stations &amp; major destinations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your concept is right on target.  Can you quantify the driver shifts you discuss?<br />
How much of a toll increase on peak drivers-assuming non-peak will remain at current levels-will go into a replacement tunnel/bridge<br />
capital fund, which Albany can&#8217;t grab for pork?<br />
You must give the peak driver some hope of a better future or even a future if the current<br />
bridge is NOT replaced in 10-20 years; maybe sooner?  If they go with a tunnel, light rail should be considered with easy transfers to MNRR lines + bus shuttles to/from LRT in Rockland and Westchester &amp; relatively light vehicles(like PCC streetcars) for easy route deviations for RR stations &amp; major destinations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

