Archives
Categories

In Search of a Rational Toll Policy for the Tappan Zee Bridge

Before the New York State Thruway Authority delayed its scheduled Nov. 19 board meeting, the speculation was that the authority might finally implement congestion pricing for passenger cars on the Tappan Zee Bridge.

Truck tolls on the Tappan Zee Bridge are doubled at peak hours, but passenger car tolls are currently set using a perverse schedule which rewards frequent driving. Drivers of passenger cars pay a $4 cash toll or a $3.60 E-Z Pass toll, but can sign up for a plan where they pay $2/trip if they make at least 20 monthly trips.

In 1999, the Thruway Authority studied the effects of raising peak-hour tolls; that study found that different variable pricing schemes could shift up to 9% of peak-hour car traffic to the shoulder periods. To be more precise, a significant number of peak-hour commuters would shift to the shoulder periods to save money; a smaller number of shoulder-period commuters would shift to the peak to take advantage of reduced peak-hour congestion.

While the authority has not yet announced the new date of its next board meeting, advocates are hopeful that it will move towards a more rational toll structure on the Tappan Zee Bridge that would help reduce traffic congestion and air pollution. By doing so, the Thruway Authority would join the NJ Turnpike Authority and the Port Authority, the latter of which would increase the differential between on-peak and off-peak tolls at its Hudson River crossings from $1 to $2 as part of a proposed fare and toll increase.

Share This Post on Social
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

1 Comment
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ralph Braskett
Ralph Braskett
16 years ago

Your concept is right on target. Can you quantify the driver shifts you discuss?
How much of a toll increase on peak drivers-assuming non-peak will remain at current levels-will go into a replacement tunnel/bridge
capital fund, which Albany can’t grab for pork?
You must give the peak driver some hope of a better future or even a future if the current
bridge is NOT replaced in 10-20 years; maybe sooner? If they go with a tunnel, light rail should be considered with easy transfers to MNRR lines + bus shuttles to/from LRT in Rockland and Westchester & relatively light vehicles(like PCC streetcars) for easy route deviations for RR stations & major destinations.

1
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x