<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Q Poll: Do You Want to Pay More? (You&#039;ll Get Nothing in Return)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.tstc.org/2007/11/19/q-poll-do-you-want-to-pay-more-youll-get-nothing-in-return/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.tstc.org/2007/11/19/q-poll-do-you-want-to-pay-more-youll-get-nothing-in-return/</link>
	<description>News and opinion from the Tri-State Transportation Campaign</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:36:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Higashide</title>
		<link>http://blog.tstc.org/2007/11/19/q-poll-do-you-want-to-pay-more-youll-get-nothing-in-return/comment-page-1/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Higashide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 19:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tstc.org/2007/11/19/q-poll-do-you-want-to-pay-more-youll-get-nothing-in-return/#comment-47</guid>
		<description>Pat, I think you meant to comment on &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.tstc.org/2008/01/10/q-poll-finds-most-nyc-voters-support-congestion-pricing/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the post&lt;/a&gt; from today. This post is from November and refers to an earlier Q poll.

It looks like Google News is treating this post as if it&#039;s the new one, for some reason. I&#039;ve added an update to explain this at the top of the post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pat, I think you meant to comment on <a href="http://blog.tstc.org/2008/01/10/q-poll-finds-most-nyc-voters-support-congestion-pricing/" rel="nofollow">the post</a> from today. This post is from November and refers to an earlier Q poll.</p>
<p>It looks like Google News is treating this post as if it&#8217;s the new one, for some reason. I&#8217;ve added an update to explain this at the top of the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Smith</title>
		<link>http://blog.tstc.org/2007/11/19/q-poll-do-you-want-to-pay-more-youll-get-nothing-in-return/comment-page-1/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 18:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tstc.org/2007/11/19/q-poll-do-you-want-to-pay-more-youll-get-nothing-in-return/#comment-49</guid>
		<description>I represent Quinnipiac University.

The headline on the Quinnipiac University Poll press release reads, &quot;NYC Voters Back Congestion Pricing, If It Helps Transit.&quot;

The release reports that New York City voters oppose congestion pricing 58 - 37 percent, but would support congestion pricing 60 - 37 percent if money from the plan is used to improve mass transit.

Ms. Slevin&#039;s numbers are wrong and her criticism is unwarranted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I represent Quinnipiac University.</p>
<p>The headline on the Quinnipiac University Poll press release reads, &#8220;NYC Voters Back Congestion Pricing, If It Helps Transit.&#8221;</p>
<p>The release reports that New York City voters oppose congestion pricing 58 &#8211; 37 percent, but would support congestion pricing 60 &#8211; 37 percent if money from the plan is used to improve mass transit.</p>
<p>Ms. Slevin&#8217;s numbers are wrong and her criticism is unwarranted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Q Poll Finds NYC Support For Congestion Pricing &#171; Mobilizing the Region</title>
		<link>http://blog.tstc.org/2007/11/19/q-poll-do-you-want-to-pay-more-youll-get-nothing-in-return/comment-page-1/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Q Poll Finds NYC Support For Congestion Pricing &#171; Mobilizing the Region</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 18:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tstc.org/2007/11/19/q-poll-do-you-want-to-pay-more-youll-get-nothing-in-return/#comment-48</guid>
		<description>[...] Quinnipiac pollsters should be credited for asking the right question. In previous polls, respondents were asked whether they supported congestion pricing but were not told that pricing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Quinnipiac pollsters should be credited for asking the right question. In previous polls, respondents were asked whether they supported congestion pricing but were not told that pricing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Streetsblog &#187; TSTC Asks the Obvious, Yet Elusive, Pricing Poll Question</title>
		<link>http://blog.tstc.org/2007/11/19/q-poll-do-you-want-to-pay-more-youll-get-nothing-in-return/comment-page-1/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Streetsblog &#187; TSTC Asks the Obvious, Yet Elusive, Pricing Poll Question</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 15:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tstc.org/2007/11/19/q-poll-do-you-want-to-pay-more-youll-get-nothing-in-return/#comment-46</guid>
		<description>[...] latest Quinnipiac congestion pricing poll were repeated with little analysis earlier this week, the Tri-State Transportation Campaign noted a significant, though not surprising, shortcoming.The Quinnipiac poll failed to link [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] latest Quinnipiac congestion pricing poll were repeated with little analysis earlier this week, the Tri-State Transportation Campaign noted a significant, though not surprising, shortcoming.The Quinnipiac poll failed to link [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

